alt.education

On Sep 13, 5:58 am, Bob LeChevalier wrote:
> Gabriel wrote:
> >On Aug 10, 9:02 am, Bob LeChevalier wrote:
> >> "Gabriel" wrote:
> >> >> It is a mechanism that is not part of any science.
>
> >> >Neither is your non-existent mechanism of unobservable, unverifiable,
> >> >untestable macro-evolution.
>
> >> But of course, it IS. Your opinion as an ignoramus is irrelevant.
>
> >> >Science is all of those things. Evolution is none of them.
>
> >> Evolution is a fact.
>
> >Notice how you merely offer your opinion on all of this.
>
> You have been repeatedly offered a website full of information in
> copious quantities, and you have ignored it.

I offered refutation of articles on that website on more than one
occasion. In the meantime,



of which you have ignored and refutes anything else the religion of
evolution has fed you.

> Usenet is not the place
> to post multiple-textbooks worth of information in response to every
> loser who refuses to read a web page.

Are insults your evidence? I suggest you put your money where your
mouth is and start reading numerous web pages yourself that easily
refutes every point brought up those who follow the religion of
evolution.

Thanks for posting.

>
> >I guess you think your insult is the evidence.
>
> The evidence was provided for you. You have ignored it.
>
> >Thank you for proving my point.
>
> You have no point.
>
> lojbab