alt.education

Gabriel wrote:
>> You have been repeatedly offered a website full of information in
>> copious quantities, and you have ignored it.
>
>I offered refutation of articles on that website on more than one
>occasion.

You have offered nothing but denials.

Since the site contains specific evidence that you have asked for, you
must refute EACH PIECE of EVIDENCE, or the weight of the evidence
defeats your argument.

>
>
>of which you have ignored and refutes anything else the religion of
>evolution has fed you.

That site "refutes" nothing. It just makes the same sort of silly
arguments that you make.

The ONLY thing that can refute evolution is actual evidence that
violates something that evolution has predicted. That's not easy to
imagine at this point.

>> Usenet is not the place
>> to post multiple-textbooks worth of information in response to every
>> loser who refuses to read a web page.
>
>Are insults your evidence?

I told you where the evidence was. All that is left is to insult
someone who is unwilling to read it and learn.

>I suggest you put your money where your
>mouth is and start reading numerous web pages yourself that easily
>refutes every point brought up those who follow the religion of
>evolution.

I have been reading arguments about evolution on the Internet for 15
years. There have been no "refutations", only the sort of ignorance
you spout, or occasionally someone explicitly and intentionally
misrepresenting things, which is even worse than ignorance.

You have demonstrated that you don't even understand what evolution
is. You have failed to understand that a mountain of change can be
built one grain of sand at a time. You have failed to understand that
the sudden appearance of anything recognizably winglike on something
that has no wings would NOT be evolution.

lojbab