On Aug 23, 1:59 am, Anthony Summers
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:06:45 -0700, OrangeDood wrote...
> > > > >> > Hmm.....how would it be any different than a Nat Assoc of
> > > > >> > Black Journalists? Wouldn't the goals be the same?
>
> > > > >> No, I think not. The NABJ seeks to level the playing field.
> > > > >> Some prospective NAWJ would be opposed to leveling the playing
> > > > >> field, because that would mean less jobs for white journalists.
>
> > > > > Is it your belief that there are no members of the NABJ who seek
> > > > > to tilt the playing field in favor of black journalists?
>
> > > > Well, I would hesitate to say "no" but "hardly any" would be OK.
>
> > > Who gets to decide when the playing field is level?
>
> > Seriously? What kind of a stupid fucking question is that?
>
> What I mean is when is it no longer okay for racist organizations to
> exist? You seem to claim that the NABJ is okay, as they seek only to
> level the playing field. Presumably, once the playing field is level
> then there is no need for the NABJ to exist. In fact, for them to
> continue to exist at that point would put them on par with any putative
> NAWJ. So I ask you, who gets to decide when it's no longer okay?
The same people who decided it's OK now.
Good God. What a flaming tool.
Cheers,
--Jeff