alt.education

On Sep 16, 12:01 pm, Budikka666 wrote:
> On Sep 16, 7:40 am, Gabriel wrote:
> [snipped]
> You know what, "Gabriel", we're tired of hearing all this whining
> about what people *claim* evolution cannot do, and tired of people
> posting out-of-context, distorted, out-of-date or downright fabricated
> "quotes" from purported PhD's who reject evolution.

Let's stop right there. You're already claiming something fairly bold,
so let's see if you can back up your claim and show if you're really
being honest:

Why don't you present detailed information to back up what you're
claiming you know about how all those specific PhD's listed are
"fabricated, distorted" and other bold claims you want to make. Can
you do that? If not, you're showing that you can do little more than
be dishonest. Show me you can be honest, and I'll discuss it with you.
So waiting for the detailed information you possess on those 300
people being fabricated and distorted please. Thanks.

>
> For every PhD you can cite who rejects it, there's a hundred from all
> people of all nationalities, of all faiths, who accept it. So if it
> came down to majority vote, *you* lose.
>
> But guess what? Science isn't done by majority vote. It's done by
> observation and investigation and it's settled by what the weight of
> the scientific evidence demonstrates.
>
> It's time to put up or shut up. Post right here in this thread in
> response to this message the best **positive** **scientific** evidence
> you have supporting creation, and let's formally debate it, you and
> me.
>
> Can you do that or not?
>
> The Theory of Evolution has almost One Hundred and Fifty Years of
> solid scientific progress behind it, What do *you* have? Let's find
> out, shall we?
>
> Budikka