alt.education

In article < @ > Jerry Kraus writes:
> On Aug 24, 8:29 am, Wide Eyed in Wonder wrote:
> > On Aug 24, 8:23 am, Jack wrote:
>
> >
> > What about the number of pro-life parents compared to pro-choice
> > adults without children. The fact that the pro-choice abort their own
> > in one more example (along with homosexual marriages) that pro-life
> > Christians will outgrow the pro-choice liberals, and the next
> > generation is secure...abortion will eventually die, when pro-choice,
> > childless adults die off.
> >
> > Kenneth Clifton
> >


> I want to sincerely congratulate you. That is the stupidest, most
> illogical argument I have heard in my entire life. You have truly
> outdone yourself.



Aye, but ye must have missed this one then:

Liberals have been a long proponent of "all for one, and one for all"
a phrase of their friends, the French. Basically, this is a call for
diversity (all for one) and unity (one for all). But, what happens,
lately, when the ONE above is conservative or evangelical? Suddenly,
they claim a constitutional clause prevents ALL (tax money) from
helping that ONE, even as they still demand the ONE (the conservative
or religious) still help pay for ALL (the government). So, now,
liberals have abandoned the French.


Kenneth Clifton



Now, would you have thought it possible for so many
non-sequiturs to have been confined to so small
a space, without tearing one another's throats
out?


-- cary