On Aug 24, 1:03 pm, c...@ (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
> In article < ...@ > Jerry Kraus
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 24, 11:43 am, c...@ (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
> > > In article < ...@ > Jerry Kraus
>
> > > > On Aug 24, 8:29 am, Wide Eyed in Wonder
> > > > > On Aug 24, 8:23 am, Jack
>
> > > > > What about the number of pro-life parents compared to pro-choice
> > > > > adults without children. The fact that the pro-choice abort their own
> > > > > in one more example (along with homosexual marriages) that pro-life
> > > > > Christians will outgrow the pro-choice liberals, and the next
> > > > > generation is secure...abortion will eventually die, when pro-choice,
> > > > > childless adults die off.
>
> > > > > Kenneth Clifton
> > > > >
> > > > I want to sincerely congratulate you. That is the stupidest, most
> > > > illogical argument I have heard in my entire life. You have truly
> > > > outdone yourself.
>
> > > Aye, but ye must have missed this one then:
>
> > > Liberals have been a long proponent of "all for one, and one for all"
> > > a phrase of their friends, the French. Basically, this is a call for
> > > diversity (all for one) and unity (one for all). But, what happens,
> > > lately, when the ONE above is conservative or evangelical? Suddenly,
> > > they claim a constitutional clause prevents ALL (tax money) from
> > > helping that ONE, even as they still demand the ONE (the conservative
> > > or religious) still help pay for ALL (the government). So, now,
> > > liberals have abandoned the French.
>
> > > Kenneth Clifton
> > >
>
> > > Now, would you have thought it possible for so many
> > > non-sequiturs to have been confined to so small
> > > a space, without tearing one another's throats
> > > out?
>
> > > -- cary- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > True. But the effect is a bit overdone here. One loses interest
> > before the end of the argument. I prefer my example, because it
> > doesn't gild the lily.
>
> So, you think Ken needs a good editor?
>
> -- cary- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
No. A Psychiatrist, of course.