alt.education

On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 23:00:03 +0000 (UTC), cary@ (Cary
Kittrell) wrote:

>> >But since that was another time and another place, had that bill
>> >passed and all Catholics slaughtered, Anglicans would have been blameless,
>> >according to your argument.

>> >Correct?

>> Nope, they would have been violating God's call

>Oh, not at all. Why not? Well, because

> because intent is key. And intent 1000 [or 500] years ago
> is not based on intent today.

And that's where you keep getting confused.

God said love one another as I have loved you. And the protest_ants failed that
test because they didn't like Catholics.

In my illustration, it was a matter of heresy by Christians, and unrepentant
heresy after trial.

>> You're pretty slow today,
>> bubba. You don't belong in these conversations. You lack the knowledge to
>> participate in this discussion.

>In point of fact, I know more than you on almost every topic we've
>ever discussed.

You're so bad you can't even get my comments above correct.

> But on this particular topic, all I have to do
>is as follows: whenever you say "A", I point out that you've
>previously contradicted that by saying "B". And whenever you
>say "B", I need only remind you that two paragraphs back you
>said "A".

No, no, you just don't understand the subject.

You continue to reflect you simply can't even get straight the concepts of
personal vendetta (Catholics v protest_ants) versus erroneous Christianity
(heresy).

So you shouldn't try pretending you understand better than I do.

>I'm not sure if it's because my memory is better than yours, or
>because my logic is cleaner, or because I'm fundamentally more
>intellectually honest than you -- or merely because I'm paying attention,
>where you show no sign of doing so.

I just got thru telling you where you fail.


duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****