On Oct 6, 2:15 pm, Mark Sebree
> On Oct 6, 11:00 am, josehurtado...@ wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 4, 7:10 am, les_on_usenet
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 04:46:12 -0500, duke
> > > >On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 19:41:31 -0400, Brian E. Clark
> > > >wrote:
>
> > > >>In article
> > > >>Kittrell said...
>
> > > >>> > Nope. That was a correction against Christian heresy.
>
> > > >>> Killing people because of their religious beliefs
> > > >>> is a "correction"?
>
> > > >>Duke doesn't understand his own church's notion of
> > > >>heresy. Muslims cannot be heretics, as they are not
> > > >>part of the faith.
>
> > > >The Muslims had nothing to do with the Inquisition.
>
> > > That's what he said catholic.
>
> > > Some muslims, however were 'persuaded' to convert as were
> > > jews and they were given the harshest of treament if they
> > > were suspected of reverting.
>
> > > Muslims were eventually forced out of Spaim.
>
> > As naturally an invader should eventually be in any country that was
> > invaded. They were invaders in Spain.
>
> Do not count on that "naturally" bit. Keep in mind that the Europeans
> invaded North America as well. According to your statement, the
> Native Americans will eventually rise up and force the European
> descendants out of the USA and Canada.
>
> Mark Sebree
I will count on the naturally "bit."
It did happen in the 17th century and is commonly known as King
Phillip's War. It should be obvious what the unfortunate, bloody
outcome of it was.
Bone up on your history a bit.
>
>
>
>
> > > > Maybe you're confused with
> > > >the Crusades?
>
> > > Maybe you are just confused
>
> > > Les Hellawell
> > > Greetings from
> > > YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -