alt.education

On Oct 8, 10:10 am, ...@ wrote:
> On Oct 4, 1:49 pm, Robert wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 19:41:31 -0400, Brian E. Clark
>
> > wrote:
> > >In article , Cary
> > >Kittrell said...
>
> > >> > Nope. That was a correction against Christian heresy.
>
> > >> Killing people because of their religious beliefs
> > >> is a "correction"?
>
> > >Duke doesn't understand his own church's notion of
> > >heresy. Muslims cannot be heretics, as they are not
> > >part of the faith.
>
> > Actually heretic's are anyone that doesn't believe in the one true
> > God, and follow the dictates of His one True Church.
> > Beware to those who reject Murphy, and ignore his true Law.
>
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account from
>
> I think a heretic is someone who is a believer but who follows
> incorrect doctrine, whereas someone who follows an entirely different
> religion would be a heathen rather than a heretic.

You, to different people, you would be considered to be a heathen and
a heretic.

These definitions are always relative. To "heathens", you are the
heathen. To those that you considered "follow an incorrect doctrine",
you are the one that is following the incorrect doctrine.

Just because it is different does not make it any more or less correct
than your religious beliefs, as long as you are not trying to force
others to follow your beliefs.

Mark Sebree