rec.sport.basketball.college

On Feb 20, 2:38=A0pm, "Edward M. Kennedy" wrote:
> "Christopher Manteuffel" wrote
>
> >> As pleased with this year's progress as I am, I think up until the
> >> Wake game Duke was playing about as good as it could. =A0I am gonna
> >> go out on a limb and predict a 4-2 regular season finish, no ACC
> >> title, and people wondering how in the hell we got a two seed.
>
> > You know Tedward, I think that one could do a very interesting paper
> > on reverse weauxfing as a defense mechanism on your rsbc posts.
>
> This is one of the most unconventional Duke teams ever
> and has its own match up problems. =A0They have to make
> their threes and play great D. =A0To get enough open treys,
> they have to have beat their man off the dribble.

That's true they have to dribble, 'cause don't have that je ne sais
qoi.

They can't just run around the back court looking so faggoty that the
other team keeps their distance, leaving them open for a pass.

>
> I've said all along this team has an achilles heel and
> will live and die by the jump shot. =A0Teams are starting
> to figure Duke out -- we've been behind at the half to
> so-so teams. =A0We'll lose to a healthy UNC and probably
> one more.

You are giving me hope! I plan to vote for you.

>
> The good news is this team is as likely as any to go
> on run in the tournament. =A0I didn't feel that way in
> the beginning of the season. =A0There's still a few teams
> we don't want any part of, but sometimes the tournment
> hands you a glass of lemonade and you don't have to deal
> with the actual lemons.
>
> And don't even think about putting lemonade in my lemonade.

Lemontini, hold the tini.

>
> --Tedward