alt.education

In article <48184211-b9e0-4ac4-b8ae-e445ce1ad895@> Wide Eyed in Wonder writes:
> On Feb 15, 11:49 am, Bob LeChevalier wrote:
> > Wide Eyed in Wonder wrote:
> >
> > >Since you have supposedly asked "repeatedly" for specifics and got
> > >none in return, you can have no specifics of mine with which to
> > >disagree...correct?
> >
> > We also have no specifics with which to agree.
> >
> > So since we can neither agree nor disagree with your non-existent
> > specifics, all we can do is respond to your obnoxious attitude and
> > behavior - which is why you get only negative feedback.
>
> So, this "obnoxious attitude" began with the first post or after
> someone disagreed...with apparently nothing?
>
> >
> > If you answered people's questions, there is the slight possibility
> > that someone may agree with or compliment you, and maybe even over
> > time come to respect you (perish the thought!). If you continue your
> > present course, you'll just earn another community or three of massive
> > disrespect.
> >
> > lojbab
>
> You would complement me? I doubt that very seriously, since you have
> a prejudice against me from the start.
>
> Also, it is apparently, NOT obnoxious for you to libel my family, my
> experience, my school, and my intelligence...those comments are part
> of an academic conversation? Or, are you going to resort to a "Two
> wrongs make a right" answer?
>

Your family?


-- cary